Bayer Food Glyphosate Health Latest Monsanto Roundup weedkiller

Monsanto hit list revealed

By: Joseph Mercola, DO, Physician.

Where's Democracy Now! 1 refers to The Guardian's explosive report, 2 paperwork obtained through the discovery means of the lawsuits towards Monsanto reveal

They have journalist Carey Gillam, US non-profit USRTK and singer-songwriter Neil Younger , whose 2015 album “The Monsanto Years” was an inventive critique of the corporate.

"Records … show that Monsanto adopted a multifaceted strategy to target Reuters reporter Carey Gillam, who researched the company's weed and its links with cancer," The Guardian writes.three

. "Monsanto, now owned by the German pharmaceutical company Bayer, also oversaw a nonprofit food research organization in the 'intelligence fusion center', a term used by the FBI and other law enforcement agencies for surveillance and terrorism.

Documents, mainly from 2015 to 2017, were disclosed as part of an ongoing lawsuit about the company's health risks for Roundup weeds. "


Monsanto data present an organized plan to silence a reporter

In line with The Guardian 4, the knowledge obtained reveals how Monsanto meant to reject Gillam's ebook" White Washing: Weed Killer, Cancer, and Science Corruption 5 " launch in 2017, instructing "industry and farm customers" to publish damaging critiques and paying Google to promote search results that criticize Gillam and his work.

All in all, the attack on Gillam's e-book, "Project Tree" 6 (internally codenamed the Monsanto Defense Directive to guard the company from all threats to its business7), had greater than 20 action points, including regulatory dedication and "providing science-based information9". Gillam advised The Guardian that the documents are "just one example of how a company works behind the scenes to try to manipulate what the public knows about its products and practices. "

The employees of the Guardian, a Monsanto PR firm, also appears to have put strain on Reuters to stop Gillam from saying Monsanto and its merchandise by saying that they’ll continue to strongly emphasize [Gillam’s] journalists to our full potential.

August 9, 2019, The Guardian Gillam is turning into extra emotional and states: eight

“As a journalist who has dealt with business in America for over 30 years, I am very often shocked by the use of propaganda tactics.” I do know that strain corporations can and do try to obtain constructive coverage and limit reporting. which they regard as unfavorable in their enterprise practices and products.

But once I lately acquired virtually 50 pages of Monsanto inner messages concerning the company plans to direct me and my fame, I was shocked… I never dreamed I might guarantee my Monsanto unnitelman…

One Monsanto plan included paying me for internet hosting a weblog publish so that Monsanto's info would appear at the prime of certain Internet searches containing my identify … As well as, Monsanto produced a video to help improve company-planned propaganda about me and my work …

The documents present that Monsanto recruited Washington DC's FTI Consulting to assist with the plans. The FTI was in the information earlier this yr after one in every of its staff stood up as a reporter at a Roundup most cancers check in March in San Francisco.

The lady pretended to announce the Hardeman v Monsanto experiment while suggesting to the appropriate journalists. covers sure litigations that favor Monsanto. "


The USRTK on the Monsanto Observatory

The Monsanto Observatory also produced written reports on Young's anti-Monsanto defense efforts and the USRTK's activities with the USRTK. "The Freedom of Info Act (FOIA)."

"Monsanto officers have been repeatedly involved about disclosure of their financial relations with investigators, who might help claims that they had" concealed in an undisclosed investigation. " The Guardian writes 10

Among the many many steps listed in Monsanto's USRTK Response Plan11 are "Edit Existing Copy" for "Bolster Language Transparency and Collaboration" and "Write a Message that Tells the Story Project Impact (one that resonates well with the public), who does nonsense through collaboration between Monsanto and the Academy … "The Guardian provides: 12

" Government fusion centers continue to raise privacy concerns about the way law enforcement collects, monitors, and shares

intelligence centers that track legitimate criminal threats, such as cyberattacks, but "it turns into worrying if you see corporations using their money to research people who are exercising their first rights of change," Dave Maass said. senior investigator at the Electronic Frontier Foundation …

Michael Baum, one of the attorneys at the Roundup trials who disclosed the records, said the records were still "evidence of the right and deliberate neglect of the rights and security of others" … " the abuse they’ve achieved in reaching such high sales, "he added."


Press Launch August 9, 2019, USRTK feedback on documented marketing campaign towards group: 13

“USRTK has released its public record requests universities since 2015, which has led to many revelations of collusion with academics in the industry…

Roundup cancer trial Monsanto was concerned that "the potential for public information requests" can be very damaging, "and thus devised a plan to counter USRTK research …

" The story of Monsanto Papers is that the company is acting like it has a tremendous amount of hi, "said Gary Ruskin, the leader of the study. "Whenever researchers, journalists, and others raise questions about their business, they attack. We are just the latest example. This has been going on for years."

The press release lists a number of key findings in documents detailing how Monsanto intended to secure its "freedom of action." One way to do this was "positioning." The USRTK's investigation into what it did "as an attack on scientific integrity and academic freedom."

The documents also show that Monsanto would have the right to review all FOIA published documents before they were released to the USRTK. " , even though the USRTK requested the documents from the state FOI, ”the press release states. Monsanto's marketing campaign plan also specified using third parties to fight the USRTK.

Again, this tactic is deliberately used to make it appear that Monsanto has nothing to do with USRTK criticism, although it is in truth a driving and coordinating pressure.

Recruiting third events embrace Forbes and different third-party content material providers, GMO response assistants, Sense About Science, Science Media Middle, Worldwide Meals Info Council, Numerous Farmers Group, Jon Entine with Genetic Literacy Undertaking, Henry Miller (beforehand caught publishing articles written by Monsanto that led to Forbes firing and deleting his articles).


AgBioChatter advises removing of emails

that the USRTK is seen as a menace to industrial enterprise also seems in the September 2015 e mail change14,15 between a number of Monsanto staff, together with Monsanto scienti.

The dialogue centered on the "unfortunate" language utilized by the nameless individual in his correspondence with teachers on GMO responses – described by the USRTK as "a private mailing list server used by the agrochemical industry and its allies for coordinating messaging and lobbying activities. in an email sent to AgBioChatter members (forwarded in an email exchange), Karl Haro von Mogel, Media Director at GMO Promotion Group Biofortified 17, advised: 18

"It appears that evidently AgBioChatter has been it is inevitable that it is going to be the subject of a future FOIA It appears that evidently Ruskin didn’t embrace it within the final FOIA round, but is more likely to take part sooner or later If someone right here has not taken the Ruskin Cleanse occasion aa of those personal emails, it means they’ve more content material to turn to the fallacious story. "

In other words, it appears that Haro von Mogel would have advised people to remove emails – to get rid of the evidence – to keep the behind-the-scenes truth out of the way, the USRTK had filed a FOIA request for AgBioChatter correspondence.


Monsanto was accused of misusing personal information in Europe.

Details of Monsanto's attacks on Gillam and the USRTK come with Bayer's admission that Monsanto kept lists of hundreds of lawmakers, researchers, and journalists, and their views on GMOs in France and other European countries.19,20

. According to Reuters, 21 files were considered "hopes to influence pesticide stocks". And while Bayer denied that the lists offered by Monsanto have been illegal, Reuters reported: 22 [19659003] “Inra and CNRS, the French public sector research institutes, said they were sending criminal complaints about personal data abuse after discovering that some of their investigators and leaders were involved with Monsanto.

A Reuters report23 also contained a quote from Matthias Berninger, Bayer's chief of public affairs, saying: "When we collect publicly available information about individuals, the Rubicon goes far beyond the actual breach of privacy laws."

Documents Illuminate GMO Responses [19659009] Another document format published for HuffPost illuminates GMO Answers, an interest group founded by Monsanto's PR firm, Ketcum PR, in an effort to polish Monsanto's rotten image. As Paul Thacker said: 24

"to start a national dialogue in Ketchum established a GMO replies campaign and took advantage of social media and third-party researchers to provide care until the meantime, Monsanto products to mitigate.

HuffPost has obtained 130 pages of internal documents from an anonymous source describing the campaign and its tactics to improve Monsanto's public image… ”

By answering all the essential questions about GMOs and enhancing their web optimization technique, GMO answers at the moment are among the greatest. most GMO related net searches. The problem is that the 'specialists' who answer the questions will not be unbiased specialists. They work in Monsanto and advocate for biotechnology. Nevertheless, you can’t say that it’s because these relationships are deliberately hidden.


imprisoned journalists assist form public opinion

Thacker also explores the influence of Tamar Haspel, a "living oyster farmer." From Cape Cod in Massachusetts, "who writes blogs and articles that favor the GMO industry and chemical cultures, and which have become a strong voice for GMO responses.

" Behind the scenes, Ketchum paperwork point to a journalist who needs to collaborate with and promote a brand new [GMO Answers] marketing campaign – and Ketchum is glad to advertise this relationship, "Thacker writes.25

" On the opposite aspect, the plan is to discuss "continuous relationship building" with Haspel – the one individual named in the media – as properly. promoting out Motley Fool and Politico…

Haspel started his [Washington] Publish columns in October 2013, promising to "negotiate form language and nail the hard, cold facts" about GMOs. These columns have been sympathetic to the agrochemical business, selling GMO merchandise and commodity crops, decreasing the hazards of toxic substances and pesticides, and discovering defects in natural farming. to scale back the risks of glyphosate and to not disclose that one among his sources was a Monsanto marketing consultant, and to attenuate the risks to youngsters of artificial food additives, citing a professor of religion as an skilled supply.

“For many who have been suspicious of Haspel's relationship with agrochemical giants, the documents provide further evidence that he is too close to the industry he writes about and that his prominent column in the Washington Post is perching to spread misleading information about agriculture and the food we eat.

At least behind the scenes, they provide a snapshot of how public relations experts work to shape the general perception of their interaction with journalists… ”Thacker writes.26

“ Ketchum PR pages discussing Haspel are labeled “Success! Skepticism strategy. "Monsanto benefits from all the stories that disrupt water in his science-critical science, and Haspel's recommendations have undoubtedly been most prominent in the national media.

Advertising his business on these articles is part of a mutually beneficial loop – he promotes his science and industry; media. ”


Who Are the Managers of Monsanto?

As Thacker factors out, Monsanto has complemented several methods launched by the tobacco business many years ago to cover the risks of smoking. issues.

This is completed in two elements: First, create your personal science, which contradicts the notion of the problem, and then affect and form the general public debate by distorting critics and emphasizing the shortage of scientific consensus. This formulated doubt is what prevents the public from turning their backs on their products and prevents regulation.

Another of the tobacco techniques utilized by Monsanto is to develop relationships with researchers and non-profit organizations, which, while sustaining the aura of independence when working "Corporate Press Envoys", use the Thacker term. Who are Monsanto's most well-known embassies? In addition to Haskel, Thacker's article titles:

  • Nina Federoff, Ph.D., Emeritus of Penn State Biology27
  • Jon Entine, Founder Director of the Genetic Literacy Project28 – Another Interest Group That Despite its Repeated Exposure, it is still being raised [19659068] Bruce Chassy, ​​Professor Emeritus, University of Illinois29,30
  • Kevin Folta, Professor, University of Florida
  • American Science Council. and health

The notion that researchers at publicly funded universities are imprisoned by industry and promote the industry's action program on taxpayers' interest while financially benefiting their masters is of particular concern.


Help USRTK Find Out The Truth – Donate Today!

One of the most important messages about home repatriation of all this is that silencing organized by critics using the immo ral tactic has been standard practice and has long been an established practice.

In fact, these shady strategies are exactly what has given Monsanto (now Bayer, as well as many other dangerous companies that operate a similar playbook) to continue selling toxic products for so long.

It is misleading to use independent outsiders to disclose a company policy. What Monsanto has done is social technology – making you think that a certain perspective is prevalent with the general public, and with journalists, researchers, and academics, even though in fact this "consensus" is a totally designed device that corporations are keen on and pay for [19659003] The USRTK has completed an incredible quantity of labor in bringing such industrial conspiracies into broad daylight. They’re a small operation with solely four staff, and persevering with to work is determined by donations. So, think about making a tax-deductible donation to the USRTK at this time. Your assistance is urgently needed and your donation will be sure that the USRTK can proceed to make clear the reality, one doc at a time.

* The article initially appeared in Mercola.

Copyright 2019 – Reprinted with permission of the entire story, with hyperlinks to the unique story?>